Pulmonary
embolism -- Meyer et al. 340 c1421 -- BMJ 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DVT=deep vein thrombosis, PE=pulmonary embolism.
Investigations
- Plasma D-dimer measurement is the next step for
most outpatients. D-dimer levels are
raised in many situations and a positive
test result is non-specific. However, based on a
negative likelihood ratio of 0.08, a
negative result for a quantitative, enzyme
linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) D-dimer
test excludes pulmonary embolism and the
need for further testing in about 30% of patients,
provided that the clinical probability is low
or moderate.11
Quantitative latex based and whole blood
qualitative D-dimer assays have a
negative likelihood ratio of 0.20 to 0.30 and
allow exclusion of pulmonary embolism only in
patients with a low clinical probability.11
In patients with a high clinical
probability, no D-dimer test is sensitive enough to
rule out pulmonary embolism.
- Refer patients with a positive D-dimer
test for multidetector spiral
computed tomography. This procedure
confirms pulmonary embolism when an
intraluminal defect is seen in several
subsegmental arteries or in a more
proximal pulmonary artery. A
ventilation and perfusion lung scan may
be selected when multidetector spiral
computed tomography is contraindicated
(renal failure, allergy to contrast
medium) but yields a high rate of
inconclusive results. Finally,
compression ultrasonography of the leg
veins showing a proximal deep vein
thrombosis in a patient with thoracic
symptoms allows confirmation of
pulmonary embolism without further
testing, but has a low diagnostic yield,
except in patients with clinical symptoms
of deep vein thrombosis.9
11
- Excluding pulmonary embolism on inappropriate criteria, for example, low D-dimer reading in a patient with a high clinical probability or a low probability lung scan in a patient with a high clinical probability, exposes patients to an increase risk of it recurring and death.