| Home > FBA |
![]() |
Fellowship by Assessment
|
|
Fellowship by Assessment is a peer-referenced quality initiative.
For me, the raison d'etre of the college is to set (and improve) standards in general practice. Looking back, it was only in the 1960's that the first chair of general practice was awarded in Edinburgh. In 1965, the MRCGP examination appeared - with 5 candidates! - and this set the scene for the development of the fellowship by assessment. In the 80's, the "what sort of doctor" initiative began to set the criteria for the fellowship by assessment, along with the experience which had been gained from trainer assessment visits, and on 1st July 1989 the fellowship by assessment became a reality.
The criteria for FBA are reviewed each year in the light of experience with the assessment and the relevance of the criteria to today's general practice. At November 1995 there were 70 Fellows by Assessment, coming from all over the country and by no means all "academics".
So why have more GP's not undertaken FBA? Perhaps this is because others have never even thought about it, or perhaps because the criteria appear so daunting. So let's have a look at what it involves...
It consists of fulfilling a (large!) number of essential criteria, defined as:
Rather rigid - perhaps too rigid - but these criteria do set a relatively high standard, and a high standard is necessary to make the award of fellowship by assessment valid.
The FBA criteria are divided into sections relating to the doctor the partnership and the practice.
The RCGP - Fellowship by Assessment website will provide further details.
I have already mentioned the College's driving force - the pursuit of quality in general practice - and the FBA, if undertaken widely, would certainly result in this. The FBA, as it develops, is setting the standards for the general practice of the future, but underneath all this I wonder if there is a hidden agenda:
So why me? My stated aims were:
But I had unstated aims too. The first was the challenge - to prove to myself that I could do it. The second was to test out my hypothesis about the "good" doctor. I saw two sorts of good doctor - the technically correct good doctor who did everything according to the rule book, and the popular good doctor who gave the patients exactly what they wanted, whether it was good for them or not. The ideal lay in a balance between the two, and the FBA was a tool to test out whether I could forge a marriage between "collegespeak" and reality.
My conclusion surprised and pleased me. Yes, there is a balance, but the college are searching for that balance too; they are not at one end of the scale, not sitting in the ivory tower, and their aims ARE realistic.